Illogical sediment retention results
I was reviewing the output of my latest run of the SDR model and I noticed that the retention values were several orders of magnitude greater than the loss values. This of course makes no sense because export should equal loss minus retention. Right?
The model seemed to run smoothly, though, so perhaps this is just a decimal place issue with one of the final field calculations for the watersheds output shapefile.
Attached is the exported table of the watersheds output file. Is this a bug? What could possibly explain why the retention values are two orders of magnitude greater than the loss?
Note: the two sheets with the suffix "sdr1' are from what I think is the latest dev build (InVEST_dev148_3_1_x86), and the other two were results from v3.0