Nutrient Retention Outputs for Standalone vs Arc

@IceAgeHi all,
I have tried to run the Nutrient Retention model with the last Standalone release 2.6 with my own data.
It's working fine but did not create the retention and export for sub-watershed.
The sample data give me the same, just the summary on the main watershed, not the sub-catchments results.
I also tried the last standalone version 2.5.3 with any success.
What should I do if I want the same result (retention and export by sub-watershed) that give me the ArcGis version?
Could zonal statistic be useful and appropriate to do that?
Cheers,
Andrea
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Yes, you can use Zonal Statistics on the results Intermediate\p_retention.tif (or n_retention.tif) and Output\p_export.tif (or n_export.tif), using your sub-watersheds to agggregate. You will get the same results as the ArcGIS version.
~ Stacie
The new stand alone models do not have any geoprocessing limitations, and the subwatershed shapefile can be of any size but should be consistent with what is found in the watershed region or, from a tool used to delineate the subwatersheds. If there is a size / geoprocessing issue within the model we want to know so we can fix it!
Cheers