This forum is shutting down! Please post new discussions at community.naturalcapitalproject.org
Different results for some carbon storage in Carbon model and Forest Edge model
I ran the Carbon model and the Forest Edge one. The Forest Edge model is supposed to have different c_aboveground from the Carbon model, right? The other carbon storage like c_deadwood, c_soil, and c_belowground are supposed to have the same result as in the Carbon model.
I tried for the current scenario in the Forest Edge model and the intermediate results were all the same, but c_aboveground in the Carbon model. But when I tried for the future scenario (f1) using the Forest Edge model, the results were all different from the ones using the Carbon model.
How could this happen? Am I doing it wrong?
Oh, and I used Zonal Analyst in ArcGIS to calculate the SUM of all the pixel values in the raster. I attached my data.